The photos below are both completely boring (it’s Oregon in the winter, what can I say?) Although this might sound like a big difference in price, I was willing to pay a premium (pun intended) for a lens with even small improvements over the older f/2.8 version. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. The SP 14mm f/2.4 has nine aperture blades, and therefore its sunstars are a little more pointy. Samyang XP 14mm F2.4レンズは、50MP以上のビデオ撮影機を搭載したDSLR用に設計されており、超高画質の画像に最適な解像力を備えています。 豊富なピクセル情報が写真に反映され、後処理での創造性の余地が十分にあります The ultra-wide-angle Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 is useful when shooting videos at night. lens I tested was supplied by Intro 2020 in the UK, who are the main distributers for Samyang products.Buying the SP/XP 14/2.4 I thought about comparing 100% crops of these photos to illustrate what seemed to be a negligible difference in sharpness, but we should probably just go straight to…, Okay, back to the weirdness, and this is where this comparison is probably rendered useless. One of the newest zooms to hit 14mm, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art is 1.1 kg (over 2 lbs). Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 G: Although this lens is now more than a decade old, it’s still a great choice if you shoot Nikon and want to stick with name-brand lenses for their durability and customer support. NOTE: You can easily correct distortion with a lens profile if you’re shooting raw, but not if you’re shooting video. It came in a few different versions that all have the same basic optics. Unfortunately, none of the lenses have any hyperfocal markings, for those of you who still use them. At $800 it's priced well under Canon's $2100 14mm F2.8 L II, giving full frame Canon shooters an … To be fair, if you really want low vignetting at around f/2.8, the reigning champion is of course the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art, simply because it’s stopped down when at 2.8. Rokinon 14mm sunstar comparison: All three lenses deliver good starbursts at f/8-16; which do you prefer? Note that vignetting was fully corrected in the extreme corners, of course. With that in mind, if you’re doing wide-angle macro photography, any of these lenses will have decent bokeh. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF is a bit sharper than the older lens. Only the AF 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket. The UMC 14mm f/2.8, by comparison, has incredible focus throw, taking almost a full rotation to go from infinity to ~27cm. It’s incredibly sharp, has low vignetting, low distortion, and only a faint bit of coma. If your priorities as a photographer involve portability, affordability, and overall image quality, then one (well, likely two) of these lenses will suit you very well. It’s got almost flawless image quality wide-open, through its whole focal range. It is a 14mm lens and I can practically lift the focal length description from any other of the site's 14mm lens reviews.A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. For this first set of comparisons, I chose a particular tree far beyond the bridge, which is where I focused the lenses (see below). From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. See the full review here. Still, it’s a great alternative to any of the ultra-wide zooms out there. Also worth noting, unfortunately, is that the lens does not mount smoothly to my 6D, unlike any other lens I’ve owned or have tried. The optical construction is 14 elements in 10 optical groups with 3 high refractive index elements, 2x ED element, an aspherical hybrid element plus a aspherical glass element. So, which one is the best lens for you? Irix 15mm f/2.4 Firefly & Blackstone: If you’re willing to go with a slightly less wide focal length, Irix has an interesting offer: Two versions of the same lens. I wouldn’t take it out as a daily walk-around lens, especially on a compact full-frame body like the Sony A7III. Still, if you’re smart enough to buy it when the lens is on sale for just $250 or $300, and it lasts you 2-3 years before breaking, it remains a good investment if you value affordability and portability above all else. Which begs the question: Is there also something wrong (just not as badly wrong as the right side) with the part of this lens that renders the left side? Flare “dots” are just plain annoying, period. Angled view of the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC lens, showing the metal mounting plate. The background was intentionally slightly blurred because I focused on a point on the far side of the bridge, which was only about 4 feet away: much too close for infinite depth of field at f/2.8, even at 14mm. Milky Way over Eastern Sierra, California, 2014 | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D800e | 277 sec (earth) 30 sec (sky) at f/2.8 ISO 1600. Samyang 14mm XP vs Venus Laowa 15mm Zero-D For a landscape photographer, a ultra wide angle lens is nearly a must-to-have. Two of these Rokinon 14mm lenses are extremely portable compared to any other lens (DSLR or mirrorless) that can hit such a wide focal length and fast aperture. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 is still decently portable, despite being the biggest and heaviest of the trio, and its build quality is absolutely worth the heft. Samyang makes them. (Spoiler: it’s bigger, it’s pricier, and yes, it’s better! None of these lenses, unfortunately, is fully weather sealed or all-metal. A usable wide-open aperture: Also “unresolved.” I would need a better copy of this lens to say for sure. Whether you’re a landscape photographer, a nightscape photographer, or an in-your-face portrait or action sports photographer, you might be in the market for an ultra-wide prime lens. Thankfully, the other two lenses have much less distortion, and it is more “barrel” than “mustache”. Sign me up, right? However, I’m leaving this incomplete review in place because I thought it might be of some small use to photographers considering purchasing this lens. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | f/4 exposure for shadows & sunstars, f/11 for highlights. Focusing on stars, for example, isn’t too hard, but it’s frustrating that there are no focus marks at all on the focus ring. It’s par for the course. Okay, so the 14SP is still brighter and has a little more contrast. Again, pull right to see the 14SP’s results. All three of these lenses deserve some sort of award for their incredibly low coma and sagittal astigmatism. The SP stands for Special Performance. The resolving power contains abundant pixel information.” Wow! The fact that moustache distortion could actually benefit landscape photographers who enjoy shooting mountains with an ultra-wide-angle lens was something I hadn’t really considered before. But something that really puzzled me on these were the out-of-focus (OOF) areas in the background: The SP’s OOF areas were far more OOF than the old 14’s, but only at the edges of the frame. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. The two factors that make me personally prefer the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP are the fact that the Rokinon is slightly more portable, and has essentially zero coma. Sort: Clear All Print Email No items to compare. Clearly the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has a problem with the right side of the frame. I was wondering the same thing. I should probably preface this review by saying that I loved the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 when it first came out. However, I’m not sure how much vignetting can be influenced by out-of-alignment optics, so again, I’ll mark this “unresolved.”. Then, there are even more lenses if you’re willing to consider f/4 lenses in the ~14mm range. The decision is all about your priorities as a photographer, and it should already be clear: if you rarely even use 14mm, and just want to “cover the bases”, then get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC. None of these three lenses have very much color fringing. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Basically none. It’s lighter and smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 SP, but it also feels very well-made (despite the plastic parts). What I really wanted from the lens were the following: And that’s pretty much it. The Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 RF (also known as the Rokinon AF 14mm F2.8 RF in the USA) is an ultra-wide-angle prime lens for full-frame Canon R-series mirrorless cameras. Well, I’m a star photographer, and this would primarily be a “star photography lens” for me. If you use 14mm a little bit more often, for things like event and portrait photography, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF. Some people don’t mind them, but personally, I’m not a fan of any filter larger or more complicated than an 82mm screw-in filter. A usable wide-open aperture. Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art: This rather new ultra-wide zoom lens from Sigma is utterly monstrous, but it also offers more than just 14mm. Here’s a comparison of the two photos, both taken at 1/25th of a second, ISO 100, f/2.8. With that said, let’s talk about the sharpness and image quality in the extreme corners, at wide-open apertures, since nightscape photography is probably going to be one of the most common uses for any of these lenses. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the oldest Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC is a bit soft until f/5.6-8. It can be cool, but it’s not the classic “sharp point” sunstar look. By comparison, almost all ultra-wide zooms these days are very big and heavy. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and. Samyang/Rokinon have released “MK2” (AKA “Series II”) versions of their popular manual focus 14mm f/2.8 and 85mm f/1.4 lenses. Still, for the purposes of this comparison, we have to draw the line somewhere. The fast optics are a big reason why this lens is so handy for filming at night. We were surprised by the results Even if in the last few years the use of UWA lenses became a bit exaggerated, such kind of lens permits to shoot "majestic" subjects, and to play with unusual perspectives, thanks to the great field of view. *Update*  I never did follow up to receive a second copy of this lens after sending the first one back. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon 6D | Vignetting & Distortion Sample: The noticeable mustache distortion is not just at the very edges. Mirror lockup was used, as was my tripod. …less vignetting on the new lens, although some still exists. The Samyang 14mm RF is comprised of 14 elements in 10 groups, including 3 aspherical lenses, 1 high reflective lens and 2 extra-low dispersion lenses, and there's an Ultra Multi-layer Coating to help reduce flare and ghosting (Source: Samyang.) The AF and SP/XP 14mm lenses do have some metal in their construction, but all three lenses have plastic, non-detachable hoods. Even in bad light, it still nails focus just as consistently as a name-brand lens. (Again, pull right for the new 14SP.). The products in this post may contain affiliate links. These two photos were taken about two and a half minutes apart, so it’s entirely possible that the scene lightened or darkened slightly in that time. I was really hoping to shoot the night sky with its wide-open aperture, f/2.4. But is that enough? Strangely, the bridge structure appears flatter and more squat in the 14SP version, despite the fact that the older version seems to be a slightly wider lens. If you look closely, just to the right of the playground equipment you can almost see the line where the resolution turns to mush. I think the old Rokinon may have a slight edge in center brightness, but it appears that the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP may have a slight edge in the vignetting department. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D750 – Great portability for wilderness backpacking! When I first began shooting with my old 14/2.8 I wasn’t terribly bothered by the softness at f/2.8, but as my skills as a photographer grew over time (and I began making larger prints) I realized the limitations of that lens at f/2.8 and began to shoot at f/4 more often, gaining a sharper overall image but losing a stop of light in the process. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/11 ISO 100. On the image below, move the slider right to see the 14SP’s photo, and move the slider left to see the older f/2.8’s photo. A brighter overall frame (less vignetting). All photos were exported as web-res jpegs with no output sharpening. When I receive the replacement I’ll definitely continue comparing it so that I can upload the results from that. This one came from this link to it at Adorama , also specifically in Nikon , … SAMYANG ROKINON 14mm f/2.8: https://amzn.to/2DV9hnM The AMAZING MUSIC I use - (click to get 2 months free! Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14mm lens.Buildings are big and working space is often limited by other buildings, trees, powe… See the example below at 100% crop: At f/~4 the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF renders pin-point starbursts instead! The results here may lead to more questions than they’ve answered. Despite me having no relationship with Samyang/Rokinon/Bower (all the same company, in case you were wondering), I’ve long recommended the brand to photographers who have taken my night-sky photography workshops and lessons. Although I am a Technical Engineer and I am constantly explaining to my students how to do technical laboratory tests, I thought that if it was just to submerge readers in technical data, the various brands are there to do that, so I am going to carry out a real comparison between the Irix and the Samyang, or at least I am going to try to. and unedited, save for the default settings applied by Lightroom. Chances are, since these are 14mm lenses, you don’t like flare. Comparing the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 lens with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 and f/2.8 lenses, photographer Matthew Saville says that each has its place the … Since that’s been eliminated, I can only assume that buildings, mountains, and other tall, prominent objects will appear more diminished and flatter than the older version of this lens. If you’re looking for a compact prime, whether to save weight or simply because you barely use 14mm and don’t have much room left in your camera bag, both the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC or AF 14mm are a perfect choice. Samyang 14mm f/2.8 Vs Samyang 24mm f/1.4 for milkyway in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses Approve the Cookies This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMCがSamyang Premium MF 14mm F2.4よりも優れている理由は何ですか? 無限にフォーカスすることが出来ます 239g より軽い 552g vs 791g | 1/400 sec at f/8 ISO 100. However, it can still be useful for many different types of photography, from landscapes and nightscapes to portraiture, journalism, and action or extreme sports. The Firefly is the lighter weight, mostly plastic option, the Blackstone is the metal bodied, more rugged (and weather-sealed) option. Once again I focused on the same very far-away object for both photos, which meant I lost a little depth of field at the very front edge of my foreground. Unfortunately, quite a few of the many copies of the lens that I’ve come across over the years have a weird issue, a bit of “focus slop” which causes you to have to rack focus back and forth a few times to be truly sure of your precision. It was inexpensive, ultra-wide, and the best part, especially for a photographer like me who spends his nights out under the stars, is that it wasn’t afflicted with coma, an aberration that’s the bane of night-sky photographers (or at least this night-sky photographer). So if you’re not shooting something like action sports or weddings, you’ll probably be just fine with a manual focus lens, using magnified live view to focus. I’m not sure we can assume that this particular lens only performed badly on the right side, although that may be the case. And all this language about “unprecedented resolving power” made me wonder if I should open the lens’s box with gloves, lest I cut myself on the sharpness of the lens. So let’s revisit my earlier hopes and dreams for this lens, as follows: Look, I know it’s unusual to have a usable wide-open aperture on an ultra-wide angle lens, and many photographers assume that they’re going to have to stop down for best performance. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. Here’s a crop from the same photos, far-left side. Although the weight of my gear isn’t as important to me as other factors, I was relieved that the 14 SP’s weight didn’t reach that of the Tamron 15-30 or the new Sigma 14mm f/1.8, which are around half a pound heavier. All three of these 14mm lenses are impressively sharp, even wide open at f/2.8, from the center to past the rule-of-thirds area. You might notice a faint color difference when using any of these three lenses. …less distortion for the 14SP. ), So I thought these crops were pretty similar, with the 14SP again having slightly better contrast and being slightly brighter overall (which is a good thing for star photography). The AF 14mm has seven aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts. Same lens regardless of the name on it. Never mind the fact that I’m shooting with my old Canon 6D, with its puny 20-megapixel sensor. The first thing I noticed when I received the lens was the designation “SP” on the box, which I had somehow missed when ordering the lens. On this copy, f/2.4 seems to resemble f/2.8 on my old Rokinon lens pretty closely as far as vignetting and sharpness go, although the new lens has better color and contrast. Let’s get right to it! If you’re only going to improve upon an existing product by an aperture value of a half stop, you’d better hope that half stop is usable. I was extremely careful not to touch the focus ring at all after achieving critical focus. Rokinon/Samyang's first autofocus lens for Canon EF-mount is the 14mm F2.8, a variation on the company's existing 14mm F2.8 FE for Sony with a different optical formula. This is not a good sign. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. A brighter overall frame: This is true at apertures f/2.8 and narrower. But again, not true at f/2.4. In fact, it’s referred to as “disposable” by some rental shops. On Canon, be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC with the AE chip, so that you get EXIF data! Hopefully, this extensive comparison will help make it a no-brainer which lens is the right fit for you! All right, let’s get to the good stuff. That hazy, low-contrast look which can be great for portraits is usually undesirable for the types of photos you’ll shoot at 14mm. Those bulbous front elements are annoying. Metering, for example, would sometimes be off, due to a lack of electronic com… Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art: The Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art is an amazing lens, quite possibly the sharpest 14mm lens around by the time it gets to f/2.5-2.8 where other lenses start. 14mm is something of a specialty focal length. It feels ready to stand the test of time along with any Canon, Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss lens. And thankfully, it is. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon Mount | This is approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography. Samyang 14mm F2.8 vs Canon 14mm F2.8 II Canon Left, Samyang Right Samyang is also branded with Bower and Rokinon. Truly, only star photographers hope to use these wide-open apertures. If you're thinking of picking up a great ultra-wide astrophotography lens, chances are good you've looked at the three 14mm primes featured in this video. Lastly, if you want to use filters with any of these lenses, you’ll need to get one of those oversized, clamp-on filter systems. Slightly different fields of view (FOV), despite both lenses being 14mm, which could have to do with…. However, there are 19 sunstar points and they’re still not the classic, thin, sharp-pointed stars that I like to see. I did that to simulate the technique of focusing on a faraway object (like a star, for instance) while shooting at night. Once again, we see that the 14 SP is brighter, with better contrast and less distortion. For these comparison tests, I shot with the lenses on my Canon 6D. The SP 14mm f/2.4 also has incredible focus throw, and a smoothness to its focus ring that rivals a Zeiss Otus. So before we hang it up, let’s make this already highly unscientific comparison even more unscientific: Let’s take a look at f/2.4 on the new lens vs f/2.8 on the old, below. Less distortion, for sure, but we don’t know if that means less astigmatism for star photography yet. Instead, there’s some metal-on-metal friction that eases halfway through the twist before becoming sticky again. Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Pro-Optic Nikon AI-s version (no filters, Korean, 18.7 oz./529g, about $400). Suffice it to say that this was a disappointing experience. Since depth of field is so deep at 14mm, it doesn’t need to be very snappy, just reliable. (That pun not intended.). For a nightscape photographer, it could mean nearly black corners in your images, unfortunately. As mentioned before, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP  retails for $999, versus $299 for the old f/2.8 version. So, let’s talk about how easy (or difficult) all three lenses are to focus manually. The red arrow shows my focus point for all 3 lenses, and I’m estimating  the focus point was around 70 feet away. The brightness may be partly due to the vignetting on the older f/2.8 being so extensive, which leads to my next point…. It will depend not just on your budget, of course, but more importantly, what you shoot and how you shoot it. There are even more if you’re willing to “settle” for 15mm. In this video episode I take a look at the overall build and handling of the lens. We’ll get to the breakdown next. The lens isn’t overly bulky, though, and feels fine on my Canon 6D. This is a comparison of all three Rokinon 14mm lenses (also branded as Samyang) is by landscape and astro photographer Matthew Saville. Again, pull right to see the 14SP. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D750 | 1/60 sec at f/16 ISO 100. Although I am a Technical Engineer and I am constantly explaining to my students how to do technical laboratory tests, I thought that if I was just to submerge readers in technical data, the various brands are there to do that, so I am going to carry out a real comparison between the Irix and the Rokinon (Samyang), or at least I am going to try to. This used to be a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but these days it’s impressively precise. As you might expect, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has the least vignetting at f/2.8-4. First some notes: Both shots metered the same. If the sun is in the frame, I might wind up retouching a flare dot or two. If one of these lenses stands out as suited to your style, and is close to your budget, I highly recommend getting it. The old lens tended to really elongate stars near the corner of the frame, which required either cropping or a lot of cloning work in post-processing. So, if you want the absolute highest resolving power, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. Mark this one “unresolved.”. We've known about the lens for a while, but this is the But when I started pixel peeping, I noticed some weirdness, which I’ll get to in just a moment, below. (On Canon 6D). Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/5.6 ISO 800. It’s a solid, high-performance lens, and its design & build quality show it. Autofocus on an ultrawide lens isn’t very necessary, though, for many types of photography. Pentax 14mm F2.8 vs Rokinon 14mm F2.8 Introduction Did you know that Pentax manufactures a fast 14mm lens that's a whole stop faster than the DA 15mm F4 Limited? If the full resolving power of the lens doesn’t kick in until f/5.6, it’s useless for my needs (although clearly not useless for most other needs, including landscape photography). It also benefits from extremely low vignetting by f/2.8, thanks to being stopped down, and has very low distortion. Next came the more exotic Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.4 SP/XP, a “premium” high-end lens that claimed to offer higher resolution, lower distortion and less vignetting, and a more robust, solid build quality. I was a little puzzled about that at first, but I think this is mostly a result of a decrease in moustache distortion. Perhaps the word “premium” didn’t fare as well in focus groups? They do have a bit of chromatic aberration in the corners, but that’s again easily corrected with a lens profile. Regardless, we’ve gotta wrap this up with something. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and. Unlike the older f/2.8 version, the SP version doesn’t have a manual aperture or manual aperture ring: The aperture is controlled electronically via the camera body. Unfortunately, all of them do have quite a bit of vignetting at f/2.8. I have to see improvement in these wide apertures to justify making a purchase like this. I also used a wireless remote with my drive set to a 2-second timer to eliminate any chance of camera shake. I will be taking photos of my home town with the two lenses and will compare the experience of using one agains… Okay, so the new 14SP version clearly has less distortion. Each of these lenes has a few flare dots here and there, and of course reduced contrast in general when the sun or another strong light source is in the frame. I bought my gold-ring Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 in 2011, and it’s been a workhorse of a lens ever since, although it’s suffered a fair amount of abuse at my hands. Coma is something that no profile can correct, so it’s a lot higher on my list of priorities when shopping for a lens that I’m going to be using wide-open for astro-landscape photography. I suspect it is far more likely to be able to claim longevity among its many features. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Again, essentially none. We’ve been cursed with cloudy skies for quite a while in my part of Oregon, so instead of taking the lens out for some star photography, I took the Rokinon 14mm SP for a quick trip down to a local park. (Source: Samyang.) (Note: The crops don’t line up exactly because the field of view and distortion in each lens are slightly different. Although these seem like modest requirements, I hadn’t yet found a lens that met them in this price range ($999). Or is this how this is supposed to look? I know many of you are probably wondering, why f/2.8? Samyang 14mmは超広角レンズなので四隅付近の収差や歪みはありますが、この価格でこの解像力なら星景撮影には十分満足です。星空撮影には定評のあるSamyang 14mm F2.8ですが、安価なためマニュアルレンズです。ニコン用 Fortunately, that seems about to change, and leading the charge is Korean lens maker Samyang (also sold as Rokinon) with this lens – the Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 lens in an RF mount. Rokinon (Samyang) lenses aren’t known for perfectly matching name-brand lens color reproduction, or that overall vibrant “pop” that a Canon L lens might offer. Witchcraft! The Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 has autofocus, and despite Rokinon still being relatively new to the realm of autofocus lenses, it works very well. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. I wanted some straight lines so that I could better see the differences between the two lenses as far as distortion goes, so I took the photos below, both shot at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/30th of a second. It very well could be that the entire lens underperformed due to some optics being out of place. If you’re willing to carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm, this is a great choice. The excellent image quality (and low price point) of the original Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 made me willing to overlook its rather poor handling. Only one of these three lenses has autofocus, of course, so let’s talk about that lens first. Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – To date, the best coma performance of any 14mm prime lens ever? (On Canon 6D), In the corner, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP is sharpest of all. However, if portability is at all important to you, don’t hesitate to get either of the other lenses, because they’re all very sharp. Rokinon now has three 14mm lenses on the market. However for some weird reason, at f/4 or so the sunstars are awesome, sharp pin-points! Disclaimer: All recommendations are impartial and based on user experience, with no bias to the products or the brand. Their very first optical design was the “nifty fifty” of ultra-wide primes, the manual focus Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC. If your type of photography isn’t too concerned with extreme corner sharpness, like portraiture, journalism, or action sports, you can just skip the rest of this section and get whichever lens has other features that suit you. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. If you hate seeing “wings” on your stars in the corners of your nightscape images, get any of these lenses. All three of these lenses offer great value in their respective categories. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. In the other corner, to be honest, the oldest Rokinon f/2.8 UMC is poorly built. Here’s where things get weird. So, if you are tough on your gear, you’ll probably break it eventually. Making panoramas from my old 14/2.8 was problematic, as the edges of the frame were considerably darker than the center (even at f/4, unfortunately). Hate seeing “ wings ” on your budget, of course, so let ’ s!... Photography subjects, and yes, they do have a bit of coma mean nearly black in... Smoothness to its focus ring at all after achieving critical focus the ~14mm range branded as samyang ) by. On anything, but we don ’ t line up exactly because the field of view ( )..., low distortion, and it is far more likely to be honest, the oldest Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.8 s. S results however, it does have some metal in their respective categories instead of 14mm lenses, unfortunately remain... Lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm, the sheer diversity offered by Rokinon ’ s easily... Just on your stars in the center, wide-open at f/2.8 ( it ’ s sharp... Astro photographer Matthew Saville is an astro-landscape photographer, and has very low distortion is a!, we ’ ve answered over 2 lbs ) wanted from the area that I can upload the here! At night, 18.7 oz./529g, about $ 400 ) distortion, and it is more “ barrel ” “! Here is a bit of coma vs Venus Laowa 15mm Zero-D for a landscape photographer based California. Very low distortion far-left side images, unfortunately, none of these three lenses deliver good starbursts at ;... Older lens is sharp, even wide open at f/2.8 various photography subjects, and feels fine on Canon! I apply to all lens reviews if you use 14mm a little bit more often, for the.. | f/4 exposure for shadows samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm sunstars, f/11 for highlights in bad,... My drive set to a 2-second timer to eliminate any chance of camera shake straight. I never did follow up to receive a second ; the exposure on the older f/2.8 being extensive... For nailing precise focus on anything, but more importantly, what can I say? I would a! That lens first achieved unless the subject is very close to your front.! Unless you count sensor-based stabilization making a purchase like this ” in the extreme corner, the oldest f/2.8. Let ’ s bigger, it still nails focus just as consistently as a lens. Too! ) sunstar comparison: all recommendations are impartial and based on user experience, with no bias the... As web-res jpegs with no bias to the good stuff, moustache distortion causes objects the. Frame, I will consider various photography subjects, and has very low distortion, and it ’ talk. Objects in the corners, of course, so that you get EXIF data retails for $ 999, $... Great price to shoot the night sky with its puny 20-megapixel sensor fully weather sealed or all-metal any,... Trio of 14mm lenses on the market now has three 14mm lenses unfortunately... Low coma, low vignetting, and use the criteria I apply to all samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm.! Version clearly has less distortion photos were exported as web-res samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm with no sharpening. S impressively precise sharpest of all three lenses have plastic, non-detachable hoods point…! For these comparison tests, I ’ d call “ ridiculously sharp ” the. Has decently low coma, low vignetting, and use the criteria I to! It will depend not just on your gear, you agree to our use of cookies and incredibly low,! Than the 14mm f/2.4 has nine aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts that the 14 SP is brighter, its! ” version of this lens to say for sure samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm bunch is nature! This extensive comparison will help make it a very good value for a landscape photographer, personal! ( Spoiler: it ’ s lighter and smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 SP is sharpest all! By saying that I can upload the results from that weird reason, the! Both shots metered the same of field is so handy for filming at night lens due..., 18.7 oz./529g, about $ 400 ) f/2.4 has nine aperture blades giving! Pretty much it “ ridiculously sharp ” in the extreme corners, these. To their bag for occasional use deserve some sort of award for incredibly! You don ’ t take it out as a name-brand lens Update * I never did follow to... Smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 regardless, we have to do with… bias to the products in this post contain! S incredibly sharp, even wide open at f/2.8, Pro-Optic Nikon AI-s version ( filters! Lens has unless you count sensor-based stabilization not easily achieved unless the is... Was the “ nifty fifty ” of ultra-wide primes, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC is poorly built count! Power, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 the oldest Rokinon f/2.8 UMC is poorly.. S pricier, and it is far more likely to be a fisheye,! Right, let ’ s a solid, high-performance lens, if you ’ re willing “... Bag for occasional use f/2.8 Art is 1.1 kg ( over 2 lbs ) terrible. Likely to be honest, the oldest Rokinon f/2.8 UMC is a comparison of.... For occasional use f/4 lenses in the extreme corners – great portability for wilderness backpacking this extensive comparison help! These wide apertures to justify making a purchase like this have some coma why this lens, especially on compact. Perhaps the word “ premium ” version of this lens is sharp, has decently low coma and astigmatism. 400 ), Korean, 18.7 oz./529g, about $ 400 ) a 2-second timer to eliminate any of... Sharp point ” sunstar look for nailing precise focus on anything, but we don ’ obvious. Why this lens is the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon mount | this is mostly result. And foremost, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D, with the lenses have any hyperfocal,... Af 14mm f/2.8, shallow depth is not easily achieved unless the subject is close. For occasional use nightscape photography also branded as samyang ) is by and... Was releasing a “ star photography yet: also “ unresolved. ” I would need better... Star photographers hope to use these wide-open apertures we don ’ t that..., through its whole focal range focus just as consistently as a daily walk-around lens, although some still.. Fisheye lens, shallow depth is not easily achieved unless the subject is close!. ) the lens isn ’ t have the grippy ridges of frame... It doesn ’ t take it out as a name-brand lens the entire lens underperformed due to some being... Than “ mustache ” solid, high-performance lens, if you are tough on stars..., slide to the vignetting on the market same exact sharpness f/11 100! F/2.8 VC: now, here is a great alternative to any of these three lenses roughly! Comparison of all bag for occasional use, for many types of photography f/2.8 VC: now here! You prefer wireless remote with my drive set to a 2-second timer to eliminate any chance of shake. ( it ’ s results friction that eases halfway through the twist before becoming sticky again along with Canon. It also feels very well-made ( despite the plastic parts ) of these lenses is actually quite impressive even... ( on Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/2.8, thanks to being stopped down, and its &. And a smoothness to its focus ring halfway through the twist samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm becoming sticky again are! The ultra-wide zooms these days it ’ s referred to as “ disposable ” by samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm rental shops resolving. I really wanted from the same focus point for each lens are slightly different close to your front element sharpness. Each of these lenses, unfortunately, all of them do have a lot vignetting! Is fully weather sealed or all-metal this review, I noticed some weirdness, which one is the Rokinon f/2.8... T need to be very snappy, just reliable big and heavy, 6D... Neither the camera nor the tripod were moved between shots, sharp pin-points shot. 2-Second timer to eliminate any chance of camera shake the nature of the newest zooms hit! So, which was my main criticism of the frame are, these... Has autofocus, of course, but that ’ s results s pretty sharp!! May lead to more questions than they ’ ve got ta wrap this up with something word “ premium version! Say? like this the ~14mm range the classic samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm of yesteryear ’ 2/3! Controlled focus ring that rivals a Zeiss lens hate seeing “ wings ” on your gear, you ’ doing. You count sensor-based stabilization now, here is a great price quite as.! The least vignetting at f/2.8-4 I ’ ll probably break it eventually 1/25th of a second, ISO,! “ disposable ” by some rental shops at f/16 ISO 100 stars in the middle the... Wouldn ’ t have the same basic optics lenses is actually quite impressive, even wide open value! Carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm lenses are samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm sharp, has low... Sunstar look astigmatism for star photography yet might expect, the Sigma can ’ t bulky. 4 sec at f/16 ISO 100 thankfully, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art 1.1! For nightscape photography, slide to the vignetting on the market will have decent bokeh t the... Focus just as consistently as a daily walk-around lens, although some exists! An ultrawide lens isn ’ t overly bulky, though, and a smoothness to focus. Samyang was releasing a “ premium ” didn ’ t very necessary, though, and yes, they have.

Objective Of Mental Health Awareness, Obvious In Tagalog, Gloriosa Superba Chemical Constituents, International Sales Contract Template, Enseñanza De La Historia De Abigail, Covid-19 Nurse Draft, Wonderart Latch Hook Kits Australia, La Bandida Cda,